* To consider a report
Minutes:
The Chair suggested that, in future years, the asset management plans be phased across a number of the Group’s meetings to allow Members sufficient time to consider the individual plans in detail. This could be considered for future years’ work programmes.
He also expressed the view that Members should be given the opportunity to review the Asset Management Strategy itself.
The Head of Finance and Treasurer presented the covering report to the Asset Management Plans for 2017/18 to 2020/21 for Fleet & Transport, Information & Communications Technology and Land & Buildings. The total value of assets as at 31 March 2017 was £31,326,000: £5.7 million of vehicles, plant and equipment, £24 million of land and buildings and £1.6 million of assets under construction.
Further to queries raised at previous meetings of the Group, the Head of Finance and Treasurer reported that investigations had been undertaken into the water usage at Ampthill, Toddington and Shefford stations.
The result of this was that it had been determined that the Ampthill benchmark had been set too high as it was set on inaccurate measurements, the actual usage measured at Shefford was too high and had been revised down, and the benchmark for Toddington was low based on previous year averages and the actual usage was used to set the 2017/18 benchmark.
The Group then went on to consider the individual Asset Management Plans.
Fleet & Transport
GC D Cook introduced the updated Fleet & Transport Asset Management Plan. He highlighted the following changes that had been made to the Plan:
In response to questions on the mileage of the fleet, which had increased significantly from 152,000 in 2015/16 to 192,000 in 2016/17, GC D Cook advised that this was the result of the additional collaboration work, such as co-responding and forced entry, taken on by the Service.
The view was expressed that if the collaboration work was at a cost to the Service, and in terms to the mileage travelled by the fleet it was, than this should be acknowledged and some form of cost recovery should be introduced.
ACO Evans confirmed that in other collaborative arrangements, such as the ICT Shared Service, costs were shared. Other blue-light services were also being charged for premises use. Co-responding was a national pilot and the actual model for delivery in the future had not yet been determined.
The Chair requested that, in reports to the FRA, this was highlighted as an issue as Members had not been aware of the increase in mileage previous to discussing this Plan.
In response to a question on forecasting the fleet maintenance revenue budget, GC Cook explained the difficulties that arose in forecasting maintenance costs, particularly for vehicles aged over 5 years. Even vehicles of the same age could have different faults.
It was acknowledged that, although the age profile of the fleet was decreasing, the Service operated a “long life” policy to extend the life of some equipment and this made it difficult to predict what future revenue costs would be.
The Head of Finance and Treasurer reassured Members that he scrutinised all budgets line by line with the relevant Principal Officer. There had not been a significant overspend or underspend in this area and the budget contained a high level of detail.
Members were advised that this budget could be considered during the budget-setting process.
Information and Communications Technology
ACO Evans referred Members to the summary of the ICT Asset Management Plan provided by the Head of ICT and advised that the annual review of the ICT Shared Service would take place at the Group’s next meeting.
ACO Evans highlighted the following points from the summary:
In response to a question, ACO Evans confirmed that iTrent was cloud-based.
Funding for the VDI evolution had not yet been approved to form part of the Capital Programme and would be considered as part of the budget setting process for 2018/19.
It was noted that this was required as the Citrix system currently used by the Service was being discontinued, therefore an upgrade was required.
Land & Buildings
The Head of Finance and Treasurer introduced the Asset Management Plan for Land & Buildings.
He drew Members’ attention to the following points:
In response to a question, the Head of Finance and Treasurer confirmed that all fluctuations in utility usage were investigated. The water usage in Control was much higher in 2016/17 than during the previous year and this was most likely due to the refurbishment of the Control Room in 2015/16 which meant that the area was not fully staffed during that year.
RESOLVED:
1. That the updated Asset Management Plans for Fleet & Transport, Information & Communications Technology and Land & Buildings be approved.
2. That consideration be given at the next Chair’s briefing to the scheduling of Asset Management Plans in future years.
3. That the Group receive the Asset Management Strategy at a future meeting.
4. That the Group be provided with an update on the investigations into the fluctuations of utility usage in stations/premises at a future meeting.
Supporting documents: